With all-new information regarding string theory, consciousness, mysticism, and biology, What the Bleep!? -- Down the Rabbit Hole is bound to inspire just as much compelling conversation as its wildly popular predecessor.
Critics Of "What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole"
Hollywood Reporter
February 10, 2006
While it does render scientific and philosophical principles in a highly accessible format, the film is nonetheless a real chore to sit through, especially in this version, weighing in at more than 2 1⁄2 hours.
TV Guide
February 03, 2006
The goofy use of animated, Flubber-like blobs aping Robert Palmer's Addicted to Love video (by way of illustrating the irresistibility of desire itself) makes it hard to take the science seriously, which is the Bleep problem in a nutshell.
Los Angeles CityBeat
March 16, 2006
...not a sequel but...really more of a "special edition" of the original..., with enough extra material to swell its length to nearly two and a half hours... If you possess anything within yelling distance of a rational mind, you'll giggle mightily before
Globe and Mail
February 17, 2006
... having sat through the entirety of this bulbous exercise in commerce, I did not come away uninspired.
With a schlockmeister's showmanship, the directors have simply taken the old film, cut in other footage and outtakes, and re-released it as a different picture.
Oregonian
February 03, 2006
The new footage adds almost nothing and feels like a lame, double-dipping cash-grab.
Salt Lake Tribune
March 03, 2006
Only the truest of true believers would want to sit through it again.
L.A. Weekly
March 16, 2006
Down the Rabbit Hole makes teen sex comedies, action-chick sci-fi and the other usual multiplex chum seem like high-minded discourse.
